Press "Enter" to skip to content

Pay for Performance, Quality of Care, and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction – Study finds no significiant improvements

Share this:

Findings from a three-year study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, shows that among hospitals participating in a voluntary quality-improvement initiative, the pay-for-performance program was not associated with a significant incremental improvement in quality of care or outcomes for acute myocardial infarction.

Pay for performance has been promoted as a tool for improving quality of care. In 2003, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) launched the largest pay-for-performance pilot project to date in the United States, including indicators for acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to determine if pay for performance was associated with either improved processes of care and outcomes or unintended consequences for acute myocardial infarction at hospitals participating in the CMS pilot project. The study also did not find evidence that pay for performance had an adverse association with improvement in processes of care that were not subject to financial incentives. Additional studies of pay for performance are needed to determine its optimal role in quality-improvement initiatives.

Read full study: Pay for Performance, Quality of Care, and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction, JAMA, Vol. 297 No. 21, June 6, 2007

Share this: